Kesari (Thr. Dr. Deepak Jayant Tilak, Editor/Publisher Kesari) And ORS. v. Vasant Rama Jadhav

bsb 1 3.SA247.16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 247 OF 2016 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 419 OF 2016 Kesari, through Dr.Deepak Jayant Tilak, Editor/Publisher Kesari & ors.

... Appellants v/s Vasant Rama Jadhav ... Respondent Ms.Neha Bhide for the appellants/applicants.

Mr.Yogesh Sankpal for Respondent No.1.

CORAM: N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 21 MARCH 2016 P.C.:

Learned counsel for the Appellant, on taking instructions from the Appellants, states that looking at the nature of the dispute and quantum of damages, the Appellant has decided not to pursue this litigation any further. This statement is accepted. In view of this position, it is not necessary to go through the rival contentions. Learned counsel for the parties state that, in paragraph 19 of the decision of the Appellate Court, the damages have been erroneously mentioned as Rs.2,000/- instead of Rs.20,000/-, which is clear from the order of the Trial Court.

bsb 2 3.SA247.16.doc The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

In view of disposal of the appeal, the civil application is also disposed of.

( N. M. JAMDAR, J. )