Jethmal Tarachand Thakur v. Ratnamala Ashok Gandhi

901-WP2797-17.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2797 OF 2017 Jethmal Tarachand Thakur

...Petitioner

Versus

Ratnamala Ashok Gandhi

...Respondent

Mr SR Nargolkar, i/b Aumkar Vijaykumar Joshi, for the Petitioner.

Mr Abhijit P Kulkarni, for Respondent No.1.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

27th November 2017 PC:- 1.

The parties have settled their disputes. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the Petitioner and the Respondent. The Petitioner is over 80 years of age. His son is present in Court. His signature has been identified by the Advocate. The Respondent is present.

2.

The Consent Terms are in order. I am satisfied that these have been drawn by the parties of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions. They are not contrary to law. 3.

The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X1' for identification with today's date. There is also an undertaking filed by 27th November 2017

901-WP2797-17.DOC the family member of the Petitioner. It is also taken on record and marked 'X2' for identification with today's date. It is accepted as an undertaking to the Court. In addition, the undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court. 4.

The Writ Petition is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. There will be no order as to costs.

5.

In view of the Consent Terms the Respondent decree holder will not proceed in execution.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) 27th November 2017