Amit Vasant Tulsankar v. The State Of Maharashtra

Tilak 1/2 (904)APPA-308-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.308 OF 2016 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.623 OF 2015 Amit Vasant Tulsankar .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent --- Mr. Aniket Vagal, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.A.R. Patil, APP for the Respondent State.

--- CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATED : 1st APRIL 2016 --- P.C. :

Heard.

I have gone through the previous order passed by this Court on 20th October 2015. In view of the said order, I am not inclined to reduce the amount of bail.

However, after hearing Mr.Aniket Vagal, the learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and the fact that the applicant continues to be in custody inspite of having succeeded in securing a bail order as back as on 9th July 2015, I am inclined to modify the order.

Tilak 2/2 (904)APPA-308-16 The prayer to reduce the amount of bail is rejected. However, the applicant shall be at liberty to furnish one surety in the sum of Rs.15,000/-, and in addition, to deposit cash of Rs.15,000/- in lieu of the other surety.

Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and to the aforesaid extent only.

(ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)