Satish Sakharam Mangle v. The State Of Maharashtra

SLJ 1 22-WP-5757-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5757 OF 2021 Satish Sakharam Mangle

...Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3189 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 5757 OF 2021 Radheshyam Laxmanrao Mopalwar ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Satish Sakharam Mangle

...Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Savita A. Prabhune, Appointed Advocate for Petitioner. Mrs. M.H.Mhatre, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Ms. Shweta R. Rathod i/by Elixir Legal Services for Intervenor/Original Complainant.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

DATE : 22nd NOVEMBER, 2022.

P.C.:- .

By the present Petition, the Petitioner has sought extension of time to file reply in Criminal Writ Petition LDVC No.276 of 2020 which is now numbered as Criminal Writ Petition (St.) No.4789 of 2020. 2.

Learned Advocate for the Intervenor/Original Petitioner in Criminal Writ Petition (St.) No.4789 of 2020 on instructions, submitted Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2022.11.24 15:17:26 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR 1/2

SLJ 2 22-WP-5757-2021.doc that, as a matter of fact, the Petitioner herein has filed his reply on 10th December 2020 in the said Petition. In support of her contention she tendered across the bar a photo copy of Order dated 10th December 2022, which records the said fact.

3.

In view thereof, the grievance of the Petitioner does not survive. Petition is accordingly disposed off. 4.

In view of disposal of Petition, Interim Application No.3189 of 2021 does not survive and is accordingly disposed off. (PRAKASH D.NAIK, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2