← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/585/2004compromisedconsent terms

Chandrakant Ramdas Mhatre v. Vasudev Hiru Naik

2016-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar1 pages

SA 585.04.sxw JPP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 585 OF 2004 Mr. Chandrakant Ramdas Mhatre.

... Appellant V/s.

Vasudev Hiru Naik.

... Respondent.

Mr. Ravi Kadam for the Appellant.

Mr. Rajdeep Gude i/b. M/s. Khandeparkar & Assoc. for the Respondent.

CORAM : N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 4 APRIL, 2016.

P.C. :- Not on board. Taken on production board by way of praecipe.

2.

The learned Counsel for the parties state that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute and have executed the Consent terms. The learned Counsel for the parties state that the Consent terms have been signed by their respective clients. At the request of the learned Counsel for the parties, Consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. 3.

The Appeal is disposed of in terms of Consent terms. (N.M. JAMDAR, J.)