Smt. Reshma Raju @ Mohammad Shaikh, And ORS v. Shri. Pandurang M. Chaugule And ANR

1 27-IA-2083-2024.doc Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date:

2024.04.06 09:14:18 +0530 WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2083 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1352 OF 2013 Smt. Reshma Raju @ Mohammad Shaikh & Ors.

: Applicants Vs.

Shri Pandurang M. Chaugule & Anr.

: Respondents ------------ Adv. Rina Kundu for the Applicants.

Adv. Harshada Manohar Rane, for the Respondent No.2. ------------ CORAM :

KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE :

4TH APRIL, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Heard the parties.

2.

This Application is filed with the prayer to incorporate some paragraphs by modifying the judgment. It is submitted that this Court while passing the judgment & Order in First Appeal No.1352 of 2013 has not referred to a judgment which was cited by the learned Advocate for the present Applicants/Appellants in the case of Seema & Ors. V/s. HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Ltd. of the Delhi High Court in FAO/99/2022 dated 6th January, 2023.

Manoj

2 27-IA-2083-2024.doc 3.

After hearing the parties, it is seen that it is not stated as to how the judgment was relevant to the decision of the case. This Court finds that the judgment was not found to be relevant and therefore the same was not referred in the judgment. This Court further finds that the party cannot by way of such Applications pray to the Court to incorporate paragraphs in the judgment & cannot supply the paragraphs which in the opinion of the party should have been in the judgment. This Court thus only clarifies that the judgment of his reference is made was not found to relevant and therefore same was not referred in the judgment. 4.

With this Application stands disposed of.

(KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Manoj