Sanjay Anand Pawar v. The State Of Maharashtra

spb/ 907apl254-16.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 254 OF 2016 Mr. Sanjay Anand Pawar ... Petitioner.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.

--- Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the State.

--- CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 17th MARCH, 2016.

P.C. :

Perused the FIR and the reply. Perused the provisions of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He had absolutely no intention to commit such an offence nor the Petitioner had tried to commit such offence. We observe that all these issues shall be considered at the stage of the trial. Learned APP on instructions of the investigating officer, who is present in the court, states that statements of the other girl students are also recorded.

Borey 1/2

spb/ 907apl254-16.doc Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, we direct the investigating officer to complete the investigation within three weeks.

The Petition stands disposed of.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) (NARESH H.PATIL,J.) .....

Borey 2/2