← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6213/2019disposed off

Mr. Nitin Narendra Kulkarni v. Mrs. Amruta Nitin Kulkarni

2021-11-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

(913)-WP-6213-19.doc.

by BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL Date: 2021.11.26 12:03:39 +0530 BALAJI GOVINDRAO PANCHAL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6213 OF 2019 Mr. Nitin Narendra Kulkarni ..Petitioner

Versus

Mrs. Amruta Nitin Kulkarni ..Respondent Ms. Swapna P. Kode, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Harshvardhan Khambete, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE : 25th NOVEMBER, 2021 P.C.

1.

The Family Court awarded maintenance of Rs.25,000/- towards household expenses in favour of the respondent - wife and actual outgoing expenses such as electricity bill, cable bill, society charges, municipal and water taxes, gas bill and telephone as against the claim for maintenance towards the expenses for child so also the respondent - wife.

2.

Based on the appointment letter of the petitioner dated 23rd October, 2017, the Family Court appreciated the cumulative income of the petitioner - husband to the tune of Rs.25,00,000/- per annum and has proceeded to award the maintenance. 3.

As such, award of maintenance which is interim in nature appears to be tune with the source of income of the BGP.

(913)-WP-6213-19.doc.

petitioner - husband.

4.

As far as the claim for reduction is concerned, in my opinion, the reasons given by the Family Court in refusing review its aforesaid order is very much justifiable. 5.

That being so, no case for interference is made out. 6.

As far as the claim of the petitioner that he has lost his job or there is reduction in his income subsequent to passing of the aforesaid impugned order can be looked into by the Court below in case if appropriate proceedings are taken out by the petitioner in accordance with law.

7.

In the above background, writ petition is dismissed. [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] BGP.