Punita Nalin Chokesy v. State Of Maharashtra, Thru. The Off. Of The Public Prosecutor And ORS

Rane * 1/2 * CP-247-2017 (SR.915) Friday, 29.9.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 247 OF 2017 Punita Nalin Chokesy ....Petitioner V/s.

State of Maharashtra, through The Office of the Public Prosecutor and Ors.

....Respondents * * * * * Mr. Devmani J. Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. None for the respondents.

CORAM :- CORAM :- R.M. SAVANT & R.M. SAVANT & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :- DATE :- 29TH SEPTEMBER, 2017.

29TH SEPTEMBER, 2017.

P.C. :- P.C. :- 1.

The contempt alleged is of the order dated 20th September, 2016. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that, the additional chargesheet has been filed but not within the time stipulated by the order of which contempt is alleged. In view of the fact that, additional

Rane * 2/2 * CP-247-2017 (SR.915) Friday, 29.9.2017 chargesheet has now been filed albeit belatedly, we do not deem it appropriate to exercise our contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J) (R.M. SAVANT, J)