Sakpal Govind Kalidas v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

spb/ 2prappr106-15.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2015 IN CRI. REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO. 105 OF 2015 Sakpal Govind Kalidas ... Applicant.

(Org.Accused) V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents.

--- Mr. M. S. Adenwala, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. D.R. More, APP for the State-Respondent No.1. Ms. Payal Parikh, Advocate for Complainant/ Respondent No.2. Mr. Vijay Jain, the Complainant-Respondent No.2 is present inperson. --- CORAM : M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.

DATE : 18th MARCH, 2015 P.C. :

Heard. Since the dispute between the Applicant (accused) and Respondent No.2 (complainant) is resolved by amicable settlement, I am inclined to condone the delay in filing revision application so that the revision application can be heard and the main dispute can be resolved. Criminal application is allowed. Delay is condoned and the revision application be registered.

(JUDGE) Borey 1/1