← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPP/214/2017others disposed off

Suvarna Atul Pathak v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-03-09Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav2 pages

909.aba397.17.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 397 OF 2017 Mrs. Rajeshree Devram Kale.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 214 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 397 OF 2017 Suvarna Atul Pathak.

... Intervenor.

In the matter between Mrs. Rajeshree Devram Kale.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Apoorv Srivastava h/f. Mr. Kushal Mor, advocate for Applicant. Ms. Meghna A. Gowalani, advocate for intervenor. Mrs. P.P. Shinde, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : MARCH 9, 2017 P.C.:

The learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted Talwalkar 1/2

909.aba397.17.sxw in the interest of justice. The learned Counsel for the applicant upon instructions submits that the applicant would surrender before the concerned Magistrate on or before 21/3/2017. In view of this, the applicant stands protected till 5 p.m. of 21/3/2017. The learned Magistrate shall consider the application filed by the present applicant with the aid of proviso to section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 upon her surrendering and decide the application on its own merits without being influenced by the withdrawal of this application.

The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

Intervention application is heard, allowed and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2