The Commissioner Nashik Municipal Corporation, Nashik v. Smt.Trupta Indarmohan Dhingra And ORS.

Sherla V.

caf.3259.2017_511(2).doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3259 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL st. NO.6946 OF 2017 The Commissioner Nasik Municipal Corporation ... Applicant Vs.

Trupta Indarmohan Dhingra & Ors.

... Respondents Mr.R.R. Lanjekar i/b M.L. Patil for the Applicant Mr.Sachin Gite for Respondent No.1, 2, 2A and 2B None for Respondent No.4 State CORAM: MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2017 P.C.:

1.

Mr.Gite represents Respondent Nos.1, 2, 2A and 2B and the learned AGP has filed appearance for Respondent No.4. None appears for Respondent No.3.

2.

Learned Counsel submits that there is a delay of 135 days in preferring the appeal. He submits that the delay is caused as there is a delay for obtaining the judgment and award and obtaining the legal opinion. He prays that the same be condoned. 1 / 2

caf.3259.2017_511(2).doc 3.

In view of the submission and for the reasons stated in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the application, the delay is condoned. Civil Application is allowed. The appeal be registered and listed for admission on 6.12.2017. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) 2 / 2