Shri Ehtesham Husain Abdul Rehman v. Mithila Developers, Thr. Partnership Firm And ANR.

8 IA 2650.22 in CP 41.19.doc Dusane

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2650 OF 2022 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 41 OF 2019 Shri. Ehtesham Husain Abdul ...Applicant Rehman V/s.

Mithila Developers, through

...Respondents

Partnership Firm & Anr.

Mr. Huzefa Nasikwala for Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. Ramiz Shaikh a/w Mr. Onkar Bangar for Respondent no. 1.

Mr. Ehtesham Husain Abdul Raheman- Petitioner present in person.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE:

16th NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C.:

1.

Petitioner and Respondent no.1 have filed Consent Terms dated 16th November 2022.

2.

Petitioner is present in the Court, in person. He states that he has signed the Consent Terms after reading and understanding the contents in of the same. Advocate Mr. Huzefa Nasikwala appearing for Petitioner has identified his signature on

8 IA 2650.22 in CP 41.19.doc the consent Terms.

3.

The Consent Terms are signed on behalf of Respondent no. 1, which is the partnership firm, by Respondent no. 1(e), Anwar Ahmed Jamil Akhtar Shaikh, who is the Managing Partner of the Partnership Firm. Advocate Mr. Ramiz Shaikh has identified his signature on the Consent Terms. Advocate Shaikh submits that Respondent no. 1 (e) is not well and therefore he is not present in the Court. The undertaking given in the Consent Terms is accepted.

4.

Contempt Petition is disposed off in terms of the Consent Terms.

5.

In view of disposal of the Contempt Petition, Interim Application does not survive and same is also disposed off. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)