← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1170/2019rule absolute

Jignesh Mansukhbhai Makwana And ORS. v. Reshma Jignesh Makwana Nee Reshma Narendra Vadher And ANR.

2020-02-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar,Retired Judge2 pages

25-cri-wp-1170-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1170 OF 2019 Jignesh M. Makwana and ors.

... Petitioners V/s.

Reshma J. Makwana and anr.

... Respondents ---------------- Mr. Akhalque Solkar a/w. Mr. Shirish Shigwan for the Petitioner. Ms Charmi Makwana for Respondent No.1.

Mr. S.R. Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State. ----------------

CORAM

:

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 20, 2020.

P.C.

1] Petitioner No.2 is present with his advocate. Respondent No.1 is present with her advocate. APP appears for the respondent - State.

2] The petitioners and respondent No.1 are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR No. 64 of 2017 and Criminal Case No. 1895/PW/2017, which is essentially under section 498-A of I.P.C.

3] In domestic violence proceedings in Case No. 289/DV/2015, consent terms were already tendered. Dinesh Sherla 1/2

25-cri-wp-1170-19.doc Accordingly, respondent No.1 has received the amount and also ornaments. Parties have agreed to handing over custody of the children to petitioner No.1- husband.

4] Respondent No.1 has orally also in the Court given no objection. She has fled an afdavit to that efect on record in the present matter.

5] In view of joint request, we make Rule absolute in terms of prayer clause "a)".

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) Dinesh Sherla 2/2