Wasim Ahmed Mohammed Jaish v. Aslam Hasan Miyan Surme

(25)ARP-132-2023.doc rajshree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.132 of 2023 Wasim Ahmed Mohammed Jaish ] ..

Petitioner vs.

Aslam Hasan Miyan Surme ] ..

Respondent None for the Petition.

Mr.Vishal Raman a/w Mujtaba Shaikh i/b Legal India for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

7th February, 2024.

P.C.

1] None for the Petitioner. On 05.01.2024 also none represented the Petitioner.

On 24.01.2024, it was directed that the order dated 21.06.2023 should be complied within one week. However, there is no compliance thereof.

2] It is evident that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Arbitration Petition and that is why is not present nor he is represented today.

In the wake of above, Arbitration Petition stand dismissed for want of prosecution.

1/2

(25)ARP-132-2023.doc [BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2