Uttar Bhartiya Public Charitable Trust And ORS. v. Smt.Bharti Sanjay Bhansali

(8)-CAC-378-14.doc 14.12.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.378 OF 2014 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.945 OF 2012 Uttar Bhartiya Public Charitable Trust and others .. Applicants

Versus

Smt. Bharti Sanjay Bhansali .. Respondent Mr. R. A. Shelke, for the Applicants.

Mr. Onkar Nagwekar i/by Mr. P. R. Arjunwadkar, for the Respondent. CORAM : R.M. SAVANT, J.

DATE : 14th DECEMBER, 2015 P.C.

1.

The above Civil Application has been filed for directing the Respondent to pay the arrears from July 2003 till date, a direction is also sought against the Respondent that they should be asked to pay the arrears of the Municipal Property Taxes and Water Charges directly to the concerned authorities. In so far as the arrears of rent are concerned, according to the Applicants the amount up to 01.06.2015 comes to Rs.1,35,720/- out of which according to the Learned Counsel for the Applicants, the Applicants have received an amount of Rs.1,08,350/- till date and therefore, according to the Applicants an amount of Rs.27,000/- BGP.

(8)-CAC-378-14.doc 14.12.2015 and odd is due from the Respondent. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Mr. Onkar Nagwekar states that the Respondent has been depositing the amount in the Court as well as paying directly to the Applicants. The said fact is not disputed by Mr. R. A. Shelke the Learned Counsel for the Applicants. However, he says that some amount is due from the Respondent. Both the Learned Counsel agree that they would sit together and try to reconcile the accounts pursuant to which if the need arises the Applicants may file a fresh Civil Application. The Learned Counsel for the Respondent Mr. Onkar Nagwekar states that the Respondent is agreeable to pay the balance of arrears if any subject to reconciliation of the account.

2.

In so far as the Municipal Property Taxes and Water Charges are concerned, the Learned Counsel Mr. R. A. Shelke states that the grievance in that respect does not survive in view of the fact that the Respondent is now required to pay separately amounts towards the Property Taxes and Water Charges. Hence, subject to liberty as aforesaid, the Civil Application is disposed of.

[R.M. SAVANT, J] BGP.