Rohan @ Bunty Tanaji Tupe v. The State Of Maharashtra

tikam 46- BA 921 of 2024.doc VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2024.05.08 18:02:17 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 921 OF 2024 Rohan @ Bunty Tanaji Tupe ... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for the State.

CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 25th APRIL, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant be permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application if there is no substantial progress in trial within one year. 3.

Considering his request, application is allowed to be withdrawn. Application is dismissed and disposed of.

4.

The Trial Court is requested to expedite the trial. 5.

Learned APP to inform the Trial Court about the order passed by this Court.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 1/1