Nitin @ Sunny Rakesh Soudai v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

908_wp_1093_15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1093 OF 2015 Nitin @ Sunny Rakesh Soudai ...Applicant (orig. accused-4)

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.... Respondents ------ Mr. Santosh Musale i/b Subhash Hulyalkar for the Applicant.

Mr. V.B.K. Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent No.1State. CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED : -1st APRIL, 2015.

P.C.

Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent No.1-State.

2.

Admitted. Heard finally.

3.

Perused the impugned order. Bail amount is Rs.50,000/- with one or two solvent sureties. The Petitioner is accused of the offence punishable under section 394 of the IPC. I do not find any fault in the order of bail. No interference is called for. megha Page No.1 of 2

908_wp_1093_15.doc 4.

The petition is dismissed accordingly.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.2 of 2