Raigad Hotel Owners v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2471 OF 2007 Kolhapur District Permit Room Beer Bar Association And Anr. Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2498 OF 2007 Pune District Permit Room Beer Bar Association, Pune Petitioners V/s.
The Commissioner State Excise And Anr.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2456 OF 2007 Association Of Bar Hotels And Restaurants And Ors. Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2478 OF 2007 Tasgaon - Palus Taluka Beer Bar Permit Room Association And Anr Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2468 OF 2007 The Thane Rural Hotel And Liquor Association Petitioners V/s.
The Commissioner State Excise And Anr.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2495 OF 2007 Pen Taluka Hotel And Bar Association And Anr. Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents Kiran Kawre 1/3
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2007 Maharashtra Rajya Khadya Peya Vikreta Mahamandal And Anr Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2511 OF 2007 Ratnagiri District Hotel Association And Anr Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2933 OF 2007 Raigad Hotel Owners Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 3097 OF 2007 The Sindhudurg Zilla Videshi Madhya Vikreta Sangh Petitioners V/s.
State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Respondents ----- None for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Ms. A. A. Purav, AGP for the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :
1.
Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January Kiran Kawre 2/3
2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.
Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.
4.
Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.
5.
Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3