Rupali Hanumant Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra Thru Gp And ORS

11.wp.7563.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7563 OF 2019 Rupali Hanumant Gaikwad ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...

Respondents .........

Mr. P.B. Shah i/b Mr. K.P. Shah for the Petitioner. Mr. C.D. Mali, A.G.P. for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sunil Gangan a/w Mr. Amol Bhagat i/b R.M.G. Law Associates for Respondent No.2.

.........

CORAM

: K.K. TATED & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE : 18th FEBRUARY, 2021.

P.C. :- Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to carry out appropriate amendment in prayer clause (c) on page 19 during the course of the day. Reverification is dispensed with. Waghmare 1 / 2

11.wp.7563.19.doc The learned Counsel Mr. Sunil Gangan appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 submits that as per earlier order dated 28.01.2021 they will decide the Petitioner's representation/ letter dated 05.05.2017 (Exhibit-J page 123 of the Petition) on or before 19.03.2021 and inform him in writing. Statement is accepted.

In view of the statement made by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition. Hence, Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructous. No order as to costs.

All contentions of both the parties are kept open. Digitally signed by Waishali S.

Waghmare Date:

2021.02.21 23:21:58 +0530 Waishali S.

Waghmare ( R.I. CHAGLA, J. ) ( K.K. TATED, J. ) Waghmare 2 / 2