← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/929/2024disposed off

Rupali Raghunath Kasekar @ Mrs. Riddhi Paresh Bhingarde v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024-04-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Madhav J. Jamdar13 pages

2024:BHC-AS:16637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.929 OF 2024 Rupali Raghunath Kasekar @ Riddhi Paresh Bhingarde ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Vipin Bidkar, Advocate, for the Applicant. Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Pankaj Vilas Khopde, P.S.I., Chiplun Police Station present. Mr. Aashish Ballal, Police Naik, Chiplun Police Station present.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 5th APRIL 2024 PC:- 1.

Heard Mr. Bidkar, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Ms. Kaushik, learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2.

This regular Bail Application is preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The relevant details are as follows:- 1.C. R. No.

2.Date of registration of F.I.R.

01/12/2020 3.Name of Police Station Chiplun, District-Ratnagiri 4.Section/s invoked 406, 409, 420, 34 of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860;

65 and 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000;

5.Date of incident 28/10/2020 to 13/09/2022 6.Date of arrest 12/04/2023 7.Date of filing of Charge-sheet 31/01/2023 8.Date of filing of Supplementary Charge-sheet 10/05/2023 3.

As per the prosecution case, the Complainant was working as an Executive Engineer-PWD, Chiplun since 21st October 2022. While going through the records of the PWD office, Chiplun, the complainant noticed a discrepancy in the amount of deposit head part II and part V and during his inquiry, he discovered that the deposit head part II and part V have been deposited by using login ID and password of the said office. Thereafter, it was discovered that Accused Nos.7 and 8 while they were in Government service working in the PWD Office, Chiplun, used the login ID and password to distribute various funds in the accounts of Accused Nos.1 to 6. Different amounts were transferred to the accounts of Accused Nos.1 to 6. Thus, as per the prosecution case, the Accused Nos.7 and 8 who were in Government employment and were working in the PWD office-Chiplun, took undue advantage of their position of authority. Thus, even as per the prosecution case, the

main accused persons are Accused Nos.7 and 8. Accused No.9 is the sibling of Accused No.7 and Accused No.1 i.e. the present Applicant is wife of Accused No.9.

4.

Mr. Bidkar, learned Counsel for the Applicant submitted that there are total 9 accused persons, out of which Accused Nos.2 to 6 and Accused No.9 have been released on bail. He submitted that F.I.R. was lodged on 1st December 2022. Accused Nos.2 to 9 were arrested on 8th December 2022. At that time, the Accused No.1 was pregnant and therefore she was not arrested. The present Applicant i.e. Accused No.1 gave birth to a female child on 2nd January 2023. The Applicant surrendered on 12th April 2023. He submitted that before that the Applicant filed an Anticipatory Bail Application and she was granted interim relief for some time. He submitted that the Applicant had earlier preferred Bail Application No.2155 of 2023 in this Court, however, the same was simplicitor withdrawn. Thereafter the Applicant preferred a Bail Application before the learned Sessions Judge, Chiplun which was rejected on 6th January 2024. He submitted that the Accused Nos.7 and 8 transferred an amount of Rs.1,76,99,510/- to the account of the Applicant. He submitted that the Applicant has re-

transferred an amount of Rs.1,71,45,985/- and the same was received either by Accused No.7 or by Accused No.9. He submitted that total amount of Rs.1,70,22,077/- has been recovered from Accused No.7 or Accused No.9. He submitted that only an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- has been recovered from Accused No.1. He submitted that the Applicant is young woman aged 32 years and is having a child aged 13 months. He submitted that the Applicant is incarcerated since one year. He submitted that the Accused Nos.2 to 6 who are having the same role as that of the Applicant, have already been released on bail and therefore the Applicant be also released on bail. To substantiate his contention that almost the entire amount which was deposited in the account of the Applicant, has been recovered, he submitted certain charts. He submitted that, in fact, the amount which was deposited in the account of Accused Nos.2, 3, 4, and 5 has not been recovered, yet the said Accused have been granted bail by the learned Trial Court. 5.

On the other hand, Ms. Kaushik, learned APP for the Respondent-State strongly opposed the Bail Application. She submitted that an amount of Rs.2,50,000/-, out of which gold has been purchased by the Accused No.9, the procedure for seizure of

the said gold is in progress. However, she confirmed that except for the said gold worth Rs.2,50,000/-, entire amount is recovered. 6.

At the outset, it is to be noted that an earlier Bail Application bearing No.2155 of 2023 was simplicitor allowed to be withdrawn by the learned Single Judge (Coram: Anuja Prabhudessai, J.) by Order dated 18th August 2023.

7.

The chart which the learned Counsel for the Applicant has submitted showing the recovery of total amount of Rs.1,71,22,077/- out of an amount of Rs.1,76,99,510/- deposited in the account of the Applicant i.e. Accused No.1, is reproduced herein below for ready reference:- AMOUNT TRANSFERRED BY MAIN ACCUSED (ACCUSED NOS. 7 & 8) TO ACCUSED NO. 11,76,99,510/- THE AMOUNT RETRANSFERRED BY ACCUSED NO. 1 RECEIVED BY ACCUSED NO. 7 & 9 - 1,71,45,985/- Sr.

AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT PURPOSE Page Nos. / No.

TRANSFERRED FROM TRANSFERRE Evidence D TO

1. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI ACCUSED No.

1,16,85,985/-AS ACCUSED RAGHUNATH KASEKAR 7 PRATIK No. 7 BANK OF INDIA PRAMOD INSTRUCTED KHANDA COLONY BHINGARDE ACCUSED ACCOUNT NUMBER - STATE BANK NUMBER 1 TO

124410110008522 OF INDIA RETRANSFER BRANCH THIS CHIPLUN AMOUNT TO ACCOUNT HIS ACCOUNT NUMBER - 20403241327

2. ACCUSED NUMBER 1 MAHESH 10,50,000/- AS ACCUSED RUPALI RAGHUNATH CHANDRAKA No. 7 KASEKAR NT REDIJ INSTRUCTED (CONTRACTO TO SEND THIS R) AMOUNT TO CONTRACTOR MAHESH REDIJ AND THIS AMOUNT IS USED FOR RECONSTRUC TION OF WALOPE'

S BUNGLOW WHICH HAS BEEN SEIZED BY POLICE

3. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI ACCUSED No.

9,70,000/- AS ACCUSED RAGHUNATH KASEKAR 7 PRATIK No. 7 AXIS BANK PRAMOD INSTRUCTED BRANCH CHINCHWAD , BHINGARDE ( TO GIVE HIM PUNE IN FORM OF THAT ACCOUNT NUMBER CASH ) AMOUNT AND 921010020225587 THIS AMOUNT IS USED FOR RECONSTRUC TION OF WALOPE'

S BUNGLOW WHICH HAS BEEN SEIZED

BY POLICE

4. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI BHAGYASHRE 14,00,000/- ( WIFE OF Bank RAGHUNATH KASEKAR E LAD ACCUSED No.

Statement BANK TRANSFER BANK

7) AND THIS TRANSFER AMOUNT IS USED FOR RECONSTRUC TION OF WALOPE'

S BUNGLOW WHICH HAS BEEN SEIZED BY POLICE

5. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI ACCUSED No.

3,90,000/- AS PER RAGHUNATH KASEKAR 9 PARESH INSTRUCTED PRAMOD BY ACCUSED BHINGARDE No. 7

6. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI ACCUSED No.

14,00,000/- FLAT RAGHUNATH KASEKAR PURCHASE USED THIS PARTICULAR AMOUNT FOR BUYING FLAT WHICH IS SEIZED BY POLICE AT PRESENT

7. ACCUSED No. 1 RUPALI GOLD WAS 2,50,000/- PURCHASE RAGHUNATH KASEKAR PURCHASED GOLD OF THIS SEIZURE AMOUNT BY PROCEDURE ACCUSED No.

IS ON GOING BY I.O.

Total 1,71,45,985/- RECOVERY FROM ACCUSED NOS. 1, 7 & 9 - 1,71,22,077/- SR.N RECOVERY PANCHNAMA AS RECOVERY AMOUNT PAGE NUMBER O BELONG TO ACCUSED FROM

NUMBER 7 GOLD JWELLERY SEIZURE ACCUSED 9,81,808/- 490-496 PANCHNAMA DATED ON NUMBER 7 08/12/2022 PRATIK PRAMOD BHINGARDE TWO CARS FROM ACCUSED 5,75,000/- 497-501 SEIZURE PANCHANAMA NUMBER 7 DATED ON 8/12/2022 PRATIK PRAMOD BHINGARDE REDMI MOBILE ACCUSED 13,000/- 502- 503 SEIZURE PANCHNAMA NUMBER 7 DATED ON - 11/12/2022 PRATIK PRAMOD BHINGARDE 1 FLAT ACCUSED 34,57,430/- 504-507 SEIZURE PANCHNAMA NUMBER 7 DATED ON 30/12/2022 PRATIK PRAMOD BHINGARDE BUNGLOW ACCUSED 70,19,346 /- 790-793 SEIZURE OF BUNGLOW NUMBER 7 DATED ON 08/05/2023 PRATIK PRAMOD BHINGARDE TOTAL RECOVERY FROM ACCUSED NO 7 1,20,46,584 /- SR.

NO RECOVERY PANCHNAMA AS BELONG TO ACCUSED NUMBER 9 RECOVERY FROM AMOUNT PAGE NUMBER 1.

FLAT ACCUSED 47,25,493/- SEIZURE PANCHNAMA NUMBER 9 DATED ON - 30/12/2022 PARESH PRAMOD BHINGARDE 2.

GOLD AT MUTHOOT ACCUDED 2,50,000/- FINANACE ( RECOVERY NUMBER 9 PROCEDURE IS ON GOING PARESH BY INVESTIGATING PRAMOD OFFICER ) BHINGARDE TOTAL RECOVERY FROM ACCUSED NUMBER. 9 49,75,493/-

SR.

NO.

RECOVERY PANCHNAMA AS RECOVERY FROM AMOUNT PAGE NUMBER BELONG TO ACCUSED NUMBER 1 TWO WHEELER SEIZURE ACCUSED 1,00,000/- 782-784 PANCHANAMA DATED ON NUMBER 1 17/04/2022 RUPALI RAGHUNATH KASEKAR @ RIDDHI PARESH BHINGARDE TOTAL RECOVERY FROM ACCUSED N0 1 1,00,000/- TOTAL RECOVERY FROM ACCUSED NOS. 7,9,1 1,71,22,077.00 ACCUSED RELEASED ON BAIL AND THEIR RECOVERY SR.

ACCUSED AMOUNT RECOVERY BAIL GRANTED PAGE NO NUMBERS GRANTED BY NUMBER ON ACCUSED NO. 2 12,03,715/- NIL 16/12/2022 LD JMFC 66-68 RAJANISH COURT RAJENDRA TAKLE ACCCUSED 1,00,50,000 NIL 16/12/2022 LD JMFC 66-68 NUMBER 3 /- COURT PRIYANKA BALAJI PAWAR ACCUSED 9.00,000/- NIL 16/12/2022 LD JMFC 66-68 NUMBER 4 COURT MANGESH VINAYAK LAD ACCUSED 70,00,000/- NIL 16/12/2022 LD JMFC 66-68 NUMBER 5 COURT SADEEP SURESH AMBURLE ACCUSED 40,00,000/- TWO CARS 16/12/2022 LD JMFC 66-68 NUMBER 6 WORTH RS COURT PRAVIN DILIP 6,00,000/- BHISE ACCUSED 3,90,000/- FLAT 10/11/2023 LD 855-865 NUMBER 9 WORTH RS SESSION PARESH PRAMOD 47,25, COURT

BHINGARDE 493/- CHIPLUN GOLD 2,50,000/- ( SEIZURE PROCEDUR E IS ON GOING BY IO) 8.

Ms. Kaushik, learned APP has verified the above chart and submitted that the said chart is correct. Thus, it is clear that almost the entire amount which was deposited in the account of Accused No.1 i.e. the present Applicant has been recovered. The Applicant is a young woman having a child aged 13 months. 9.

Accused Nos.2 to 6 who are having the same role as that of the Applicant, were released on bail by the learned Trial Court by Order dated 16th December 2022.

10. Perusal of the record shows that the incident in question occurred between 20th October 2020 to 13th September 2022, F.I.R. was lodged on 1st December 2022. Applicant was arrested on 12th April 2023 and Charge-sheet was filed on 31st January 2023 and the Supplementary Charge-sheet was filed on 10th May 2023. Thus,

investigation is complete. The trial is unlikely to conclude any time soon and is likely to take a considerably long time.

11. The Applicant is lady having a child aged 13 months.

12. There are no criminal antecedents against the present Applicant.

13. The Applicant does not appear to be at risk of flight.

14. Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by imposing conditions.

15. In view thereof, the following order:-

O R D E R

(a) The Applicant - Rupali Raghunath Kasekar alias Riddhi Paresh Bhingarde be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.379 of 2022 registered with the Chiplun Police Station, Taluka - Chiplun, District - Ratnagiri on her furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/-

with one or two local solvent sureties in the like amount.

(b) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall furnish her cell phone number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep the same updated, in case of any change thereto.

(c) The Applicant shall report to the Chiplun Police Station, Taluka - Chiplun, District - Ratnagiri as and when called by the Investigating Officer.

(d) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any Police personnel.

(e) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not contact or influence the Complainant or any witness in any manner.

(f) The Applicant shall attend the trial regularly. The Applicant shall co-operate with the Trial Court and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments thereat. (g) The Applicant shall surrender her Passport, if any, to the Investigating Officer.

16. The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

17. It is clarified that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the Trial Court shall decide the case on its merits, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Note: This order is corrected as per Speaking to the Minutes Order dated 8th April 2024.

Signed by: Sonali Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/04/2024 19:26:18