← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/398/2018

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Mr.Hanumant D. Jagdale Prop. Of Swasti Enterprises

2020-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal2 pages

601-FA-398-18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 398 OF 2018 Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.

..Appellant

Versus

Mr. Hanumant D. Jagdale ..Respondent __________ Ms. Dikshita P. Gupte, for Appellant.

Mr. Surel Shah a/w. Saurabh Butala i/b. Anwar Landge, for Respondent.

__________ CORAM : K. K. TATED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED : 31st JANUARY, 2020.

PC :

1.

Today the matter is shown on production board pursuant to the praecipe dated 31/01/2020 filed by the learned counsel for the Respondent.

2.

The Appellant has challenged the Judgment and Decree dated 18/12/2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, in Special Civil Suit No.120 of 2014. Appellant is the original defendant.

3.

Today the parties appeared before the court for filing consent terms in this Appeal. Authorized representative of the Appellant, as well as, the Respondent himself entered into the witness box and confirmed the contents of the V.B.Gokhale

601-FA-398-18 consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.

4.

The Appeal is disposed of on the basis of Consent Terms.

5.

Decree be drawn accordingly.

6.

No order as to costs.

7.

Refund of court fees as per rule is permitted. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) ----- V.B.Gokhale