Sudhakar Bhika Badgujar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Devlopment Dept. And ORS.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3085 OF 2015 Sudhakar Bhika Badgujar
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Principal Secretary, Urban Development Dept. and ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5829 OF 2015 Mrs. Kavita Balasaheb Kardak
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra (through Secretary) Urban Development Dept. and ors.
...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 95 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5829 OF 2015 State of Maharashtra (through Secretary) Urban Development Dept. and anr.
...Applicants In the matter between Mrs. Kavita Balasaheb Kardak
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
1/3
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION. 317 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5829 OF 2015 Sudhakar Bhika Badgujar ...Applicant In the matter between Mrs. Kavita Balasaheb Kardak
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 318 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 5829 OF 2015 Sudhakar Bhika Badgujar ...Applicant In the matter between Mrs. Kavita Balasaheb Kardak
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others
...Respondents
Mr. S. S. Deshmukh, for the Petitioner in WP/3085/15 and for Applicant in CA/317/15 and CA/318/15.
Mr.Ram Apte, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.Vivek V.Salunke, for the petitioner in WP/5829/15 and for Respondent No.4 in WP/3085/15.
Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Mr.V.B.Thadani, AGP 2/3
for State.
Mr.J.Shekhar i/b J.Shekhar & Co., for Respondent No.3 in WP/3085/15 & for Respondent No.5 in WP/5829/15. CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 27th APRIL, 2016 P.C. :
.
One of the grievance of the petitioners is that the Hon'ble Chief Minister has not given hearing. That being one of the principle grievance of the petitioners, Petitions can be disposed of by directing the State Government to decide the petitioners's representation expeditiously within 6 weeks from today. All the contentions of the petitioners and the respondents are kept open. Interim order passed by this Court to continue during the pendency of the representation before the State Government and for a period of 2 weeks thereafter. Both the Petitions are accordingly disposed of.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.) 3/3