The State Of Maharashtra v. Sangita Sidram Mingule

18_als_44_2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.44 OF 2016 The State of Maharashtra ...Applicant

Versus

Sangita Sidram Mingule

...Respondent

...

Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, APP for the Applicant.

Mr. N.J. Mohite i/b. Mr. J.D. Mane for the Respondent. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 3rd NOVEMBER, 2017.

P.C.:- Heard Mr. A.R. Kapadnis, the learned APP for the Applicant and Mr. N.J. Mohite, the learned counsel for the Respondent No.1. Perused the impugned judgment and notes of evidence as well as the successive dying declarations. Arguable case is made out. We therefore, grant leave to challenge the impugned judgment. Appeal is admitted.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) Megha 1/1