Sunny @ Vikrant Balasaheb Wagh v. The State Of Maharashtra

906-APPA.432.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 432 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2018 Sunny @ Vikrant Balasaheb } Wagh } Applicant versus State of Maharashtra } Respondent Mr. Sushrut Jadhwar for the applicant.

Mr. J. P. Yagnik-APP for State.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH. D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED :- MARCH 16, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

Heard both sides. Perused the application and the annexures thereto. A specific statement is made in the application that the applicant is convicted for the offences mentioned in para 2 of this application, but sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. He was also convicted for the offence punishable under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 3 months. There are no separate sentences awarded for the offence punishable under section 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and J.V.Salunke,PA

906-APPA.432.2018.doc section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. All sentences are to run concurrently. The applicant was on bail during the trial. 2.

In the above circumstances, we allow this application. The applicant-Sunny @ Vikrant Balasaheb Wagh shall be released on the same bail, but with a fresh bond pending this appeal. (PRAKASH.D.NAIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA