Smt. Neeta Arjun Kumbhar v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary School Education And Sports Departemnt And ORS

sat

13. wp 2530-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2530 OF 2021 Smt.Neeta Arjun Kumbhar

...Petitioner

vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.Prashant Bhavake for Petitioner.

Mr.S.B. Kalel, AGP for State.

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE & G.A. SANAP, JJ.

DATED : 9 MARCH 2022 P.C. :

.

Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned AGP, who appears by waiving notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 5. There is no need to issue any notice to Respondent Nos.6 and 7 as no relief is claimed by them. 2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, by consent.

3.

We direct Respondent No.5 to decide the proposal dated 9 July 2015 sent by the management seeking individual approval to the appointment of the Petitioner to the post of Shikshan Sevak in accordance with law with applicable G.Rs. at the earliest and in any case, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 4.

However, in case, approval is granted, the name of the Petitioner shall be entered in Shalarth system and by allotting Shalarth ID, Digitally signed by SANSKRUTI A THAKUR Date:

2022.03.16 11:24:43 +0530 1 / 2 SANSKRUTI A THAKUR

sat

13. wp 2530-2021 his salary together with arrears, if any, shall be released to him at the earliest and in any case, within a period of six weeks from the date of grant of approval, if any.

5.

Rule made absolute in the above terms. No costs. (G.A. SANAP, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) 2 / 2