Pankaj Shyam Chawla v. State Of Maharashtra

43 wo 1172.16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1172 OF 2016 Pankaj Shyam Chawla ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent Mr. Rajesh Mirchandani, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sanjay Udeshi i/b. Sanjay Udeshi and Co., advocates for the applicant in criminal application No. 264 of 2016.

Ms. S. D. Shinde, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J J.

DATE : 6th MARCH, 2017.

P. C. :

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, stated that the parties to the petition have settled their dispute and have filed consent terms in summary suit No.1118 of 2010. He has placed on record the copy of the consent terms filed in the said summary suit. In view of the settlement of the dispute, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave as prayed for, is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

2.

In view of the disposal of the petition, criminal application No. 264 of 2016 will not survive for consideration and the same is also disposed of.

[SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1