← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6016/2016allowed to be withdrawn

Yogesh Dinesh Bhanushali v. Neelam Yogesh Bhanushali Nee Neelam Nanda

2018-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar2 pages

21-wp-6016-2016.odt Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6016 OF 2016 Yogesh Dinesh Bhanushali ] Petitioner Vs.

Neelam Yogesh Bhanushali ] Respondent .....

Mr. Vijay Upadhyay, for Petitioner.

Mr. Rushil Mehta i/b Sagar Ambedkar , for Respondent. ....

CORAM :

R.G. KETKAR, J.

DATE :

4th October, 2018.

P.C:

Heard Mr. Upadhyay, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mehta, learned Counsel for the respondent. 2.

Learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably settled controversy between them. Mr. Upadhyay states that the petitioner is present in the Court. He has tendered photo copy his Driving Licence which is taken on record and marked "Exhibit A" for identification. Mr. Mehta submits that the respondent is present in the Court. He has tendered photo copy of her Aadhar Card, which is taken on record and marked "Exhibit B" for identification. The parties admit and confirms the settlement. The learned Counsel for the parties also confirm the settlement.

3.

Mr. Mehta submits that in pursuance of the order dated 17th February, 2017, the petitioner has deposited amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- in

21-wp-6016-2016.odt this Court. The respondent has withdrawn Rs.1,50,000/-. She may be permitted to withdraw remaining amount i.e Rs. 50,000/- along with accrued interest, if any. The petitioner has no objection. 4.

In view thereof, the respondent is permitted to withdraw Rs.50,000/- along with accured interest, if any, unconditionally. Mr. Upadhyay seeks permission to withdraw the Petition. On the motion made by Mr. Upadhyay, Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and as such is disposed of. Order accordingly.

[R.G. KETKAR, J.]