Niraj Kakad v. The State Of Maharashtra

Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2017 Niraj Kakad .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2017 (For Intervention) IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.504 OF 2017 Karan Shyam Talreja .Intervenor

IN THE MATTER OF

Niraj Kakad .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.Hrishikesh Chavan, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.R.Ambekar, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr.Prateik Parija i/b. Probus Legal, Advocate, for the Intervenor in Cri. Appln. No.504 of 2017

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

07.07.2017 P.C.

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Application, the Applicant seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R.No. 420 of 2016 registered with the Khar Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the Applicant and the learned counsel for the original Complainant state that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and have entered into consent terms. They have tendered the consent terms entered into by and between the Applicant and the Complainant. The said consent terms are taken on record and marked as "X" for identification. Pursuant to the said consent terms, the Applicant has undertaken to make payments as mentioned in Clause(5) on various dates mentioned therein, till 07.08.2018. The last instalment is to be paid on or before 07.08.2018.

4.

In view of the consent terms entered into by and between the parties, without going into the merits of the Application, the Application is allowed and the Applicant is granted pre-arrest bail on the following terms & conditions:- O R D E R (i) In the event of arrest, the Applicant be enlarged on bail, on executing PR Bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount.

5.

The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of. 6.

In view of disposal of the Application, the Intervention Application does not survive and the same stands disposed of accordingly.

Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)