Mr. Sudarshan Paygonda Sangale v. Mr. Altaf Jamil Sayyed And ORS.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1080 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.22904 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Advocate for the Appellant Present.

CORAM : AJIT N. MARE, REGISTRAR (JUDL - II) Date : 7th April, 2016 On verification of cause title of First Appeal Stamp and its Civil Application with title of original proceedings, it is seen that address of Respondent No.2 is one and the same. The Notice issued to Respondent No.2 is received unserved with remark "Government has demolished said Jaybhim Nagar and present address of Respondent No.2 is not known". It is evident that Respondent No.2 cannot be served by regular mode of service. Hence, there is no other way to serve Respondent No.2 except by way of Publication of Notice in local Newspapers as mentioned in prayer clause of Civil Application.

In view of this, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Issue Publication Notice to Respondent No.2, returnable after 8 weeks.

sd/- Registrar (Judl.-II) dsm - R(J-II) - 07.04.16