Sayed Mohammed Masood v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 / 2 01-APEAL-287-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.287 OF 2018 Sayed Mohammed Masood .... Appellant versus State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondents .......

• None for the Appellant.

• Mr.H.J. Dedhia, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 11th JUNE, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

When the matter was called out on 04/06/2018 none appeared for the Appellant. Hence the matter was directed to be kept today for dismissal.

2.

Today also none appears for the Appellant.

3.

By the order dated 16/01/2018 MPID Case No.15/2013 and 13/2015, the learned Special Judge has Nesarikar

2 / 2 01-APEAL-287-18.odt allowed the Application below Ex.44 filed by the State condoning the delay in filing the Application for taking attachment of properties absolute.

4.

Heard the learned APP.

5.

The learned Special Judge has given sound and cogent reasons while allowing the Application for condonation of delay. It cannot be said that the jurisdiction exercised by the learned Special Judge has been exercised in an arbitrary or illegal manner to warrant interference in the present Appeal. 6.

The Appeal is therefore dismissed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (B. R. GAVAI, J.)