Aakash Dadubhau Pawar And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

bdp 1/2 24-ca-407.2014.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 407 of 2014 Aakash Dadubhau Pawar and anr.

... Appellants V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent .......

Mr. Daulat G. Khamkar for Appellant.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for Respondent-State.

.......

CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE : 15th APRIL, 2019.

P.C.:

For reasons, separately recorded. The Judgment and Order dated 11th January, 2013, delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Session Case No. 962 of 2009, is set aside. 2.

The appellants are given benefit of doubt and are acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code.

bdp 2/2 24-ca-407.2014.doc 3.

They be set free forthwith, if their custody is not required by State in any other matter.

4.

Muddemal property be dealt with as directed by trial, after appeal period is over.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)