Pravin Sadashiv Parab v. The State Of Maharashtra

Mhi 1 Appeals-249-230-286-329-397IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2014 1) Amardeep Tarshem Singh ) 2) Gagandeep Krishlal Chauhan ).. Appellants vs.

(Orig.Accused No.4 & 5) The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPAL NO. 230 OF 2014 Govind Bhagoji Mankar ...

Appellant No.1 (Orig. Accused No.7) & Rahul K. Jaiswal ...

Appellant No.2 vs.

(Orig. Accused No.2) The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent-State ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 286 OF 2014 Pravin Sadashiv Parab ...

Appellant vs.

(Orig. Accused No.1) The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 329 OF 2014 Harpreet Sardul Singh ..

Appellant vs (Orig. Accused No.3) The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 397 OF 2014 Ramesh Yeshwant Shinde ..

Appellant vs.

(Orig. Accused No.6)

Mhi 2 Appeals-249-230-286-329-397The State of Maharashtra ..

Respondent ALONG WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1213 OF 2015 Mr.Ranjit Bhonsale a/w Mr. Ashwin C. Thool a/w Ms. Sphurti Shinge i/b. Ms. Naima Shaikh for the appellant in Appeal No.249 of 2014 Mr. Sudeep Pasbola a/w Mr. Bhavesh Thakur i/b. Mr. Rahul Arote for appellant in Appeal No.329/2014.

Mr. Amit K. Munde for appellant in Appeal No.230/2014. Mr. H.J.Dedhia, APP for the State.

.

CORAM:

SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.

DATE : 27th January, 2016.

P.C.

For the reasons to be recorded separately in the Judgment, the following order is passed :-

O R D E R

(i) The Appeals are allowed.

(ii) The Judgment and order dated 6.3.2014 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.499 of 2010 is quashed and set aside.

Mhi 3 Appeals-249-230-286-329-397- (iii) The appellants-accused No. 3 Harpreet Sardul Singh, accused No.4 - Amardeep Tarshem Singh and accused No.5 - Gagandeep Krishlal Chauhan are acquitted of the charge levelled against them for the offence punishable under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code. Similarly, accused No.1 Pravin Sadashiv Parab, accused No.2 Rahul Kantaprasad Jaiswal, accused No.6 Ramesh Yeshwant Shinde and accused No.7 - Govind Bhagoji Mankar are also acquitted of the charge levelled against them for the offence punishable under Section 412 read with Section 34 of I.P.C. (iv) The appellants be released forthwith, if not required in any other offence.

(v) Bail bonds stand cancelled.

(vi) Fine amount, if paid, be refunded to them.

(vii) All the Appeals stand disposed of.

(viii) As the appeals are disposed of, Criminal Application No.1213 of 2015 does not survive and stands disposed of accordingly. (SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)