Mayuri Shital Meshram v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

15-aba-846-21.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 846 OF 2021 Mayuri Shital Meshram .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent ______ Mr. Rahul Patil for Applicant.

Ms. P. N. Dabholkar, APP for State/Respondent. ______ CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 23rd MARCH, 2021 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP, on instructions, makes a statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the applicant. The statement is recorded and accepted. 2.

In this situation, learned counsel for the applicant does not press this application.

3.

It is clarified that, if in future, if the investigating agency needs her arrest in connection with the same offence, the investigating agency shall give four clear working days' notice to Gokhale

: 2 :

15-aba-846-21.odt the applicant to enable her to take appropriate steps to protect herself. The applicant shall attend the concerned police station, as and when called, and shall co-operate with the investigation. 4.

With this direction, the application is disposed of as not pressed.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)