Siddhesh Steel Treatment Private Ltd. v. Mrs. Rukmani Jaichandrai Jain

PR 12 caf 1332-15=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1332 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9071 OF 2015 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Ms. Vaishali Choudhari for the applicant.

Mr. Vikram Sathaye with Sayed Mulani i/b Mulani & Co. for the respondent.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 31/03/2015.

P.C.:

.

Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the applicant, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the respondent plaintiff filed execution application, hence, there is urgency in the present matter.

This application is preferred by the defendant for condonation of 8 days delay in filing First Appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 28.08.2014 passed by the 6th Joint, Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane in Special Civil Suit No. 473 of 2010.

Sneha Chavan 1/2

PR 12 caf 1332-15=.doc The learned counsel for the respondent plaintiff submits that they have no objection, if delay is condoned.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and as no objection given by the learned counsel for the respondent, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads thus:

"a) that the delay of about 8 days in filing the First Appeal be condoned by this Hon'ble Court." Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. (K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 2/2