Hemani Hitesh Gala @ Hemani Tekchand Visaria v. Hitesh Dinesh Gala

1 22-wp-3710.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3710 OF 2018 Hemani Hitesh Gala ... Petitioner

Versus

Hitesh Dinesh Gala ... Respondent .....

Ms. Seema Sarnaik for Petitioner.

Dr. Laxmi P. Rao for Respondent.

.....

CORAM : K. K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 19th JULY, 2018.

P. C.:

1.

Heard learned Counsel for petitioner and learned Counsel for respondent.

2.

In view of subsequent developments in regard to the provision under Section 9A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, learned Counsel for petitioner submits that the present writ petition becomes infructious, whereas, learned Counsel for the respondent contended that the petition stands abated. 3.

In view of aforesaid submissions, writ petition stands disposed of with no order as to costs.

( K. K. SONAWANE, J.) Shridhar Marutirao Sutar Shridhar Marutirao Sutar Date: 2018.07.20 12:47:17 +0530 Shridhar Sutar