← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1397/2021disposed off

Aniket @ Raghav Chandrapal Ramtekkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2021-10-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre2 pages

65. BA-1397-2021.doc BDP-SPS-TAC BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1397 OF 2021 by BHARAT DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2021.10.13 18:43:38 +0530 Aniket @ Raghav Chandrapal Ramtekkar ....Applicant.

V/s The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent Mr. Akhilesh Upadhyay for the Applicant.

Mrs. J.S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent/State. PSI Mr. Dastagir Hasan Tamboli, Nalasopara Police Station, present. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2021 P.C.:- 1] Applicant came to be arrested on 15/12/2020 in Crime No.430 of 2020 registered with Nalasopara Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 511, 34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P.I.D. Act read with Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act and is chargesheeted.

2] The role attributed to the Applicant in the crime is that of employee of the company. The task entrusted, as per prosecution, to the Applicant by the co-accused Directors is to solicit customers and promote them to deposit amounts in the Company with a promise of hefty returns. As far as investigation against the Applicant is concerned, only role that could be inferred is, acting as an employee of the Company of which other co-accused are Directors. Applicant 1/2

65. BA-1397-2021.doc called the customers and requested them to give deposits and promised hefty returns on behalf of the Company. During investigation, apart from above, no other involvement of the Applicant is noticed as he is neither beneficiary nor has directly or indirectly participated in decision making process of the Company. There are no criminal antecedents against the Applicant. That being so, case for grant of bail is made out.

3] Applicant is directed to be released on bail in Crime No.430 of 2020 registered with Nalasopara Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 511, 34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P.I.D. Act read with Section 66(D) of the I.T. Act, upon furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs 15,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall neither tamper with the evidence nor directly or indirectly try to influence the prosecution witnesses and the complainant. The Applicant shall furnish the particulars of his place of residence and contact details to the Investigating Officer of the Police Station concerned within seven days from today.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2