Vaibhav Sharad Patil v. University Of Mumbai And ANR.

chamber-902-cao-128-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.128 OF 2017 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.8753 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9047 OF 2014 Vaibhav Sharad Patil ...Applicant vs.

University of Mumbai and Another

...Respondents

Mr. Vaibhav Sharad Patil, the Applicant in person. Mr. Rui Rodrigues a/w. Mr. Abhishek Tripathi, for the RespondentUniversity. Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & MAKARAND. S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE :

JULY 06, 2017 (IN CHAMBER) P.C.:

.

Heard the Applicant and learned counsel for the Respondent-University on the Civil Application seeking condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition. The delay is of 142 days.

2.

For the reasons mentioned in the Civil Application, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, the Civil Application stands disposed of.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

chamber-902-cao-128-2017.doc 3.

We have also heard the Applicant and learned counsel for the Respondent-University on the Review Petition. 4.

Having considered the submissions made by the Applicant, we are of the view that no case is made out to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court to review the order passed by this Court on 4th October, 2016. It is well settled that the scope of review jurisdiction is extremely limited and unless the case to that effect is made out the Court cannot review the order. We do not find any error in the order warranting invocation of review jurisdiction. 5.

As a result, the Review Petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.

(MAKARAND S. KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2