Meenakshibai Yogiraj Pawar v. The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik And ORS.

1/2 903.3389.15 wp.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3389 OF 2015 Meenakshibai Yogiraj Pawar ...

Petitioner V/s.

The Chief Executive Officer, ...

Respondents.

Zilla Parishad, Nashik and others Mr. Prashant D. Patil for Petitioner Mr. A. R. Kapadnis for Respondent nos. 1 to 3 Mr. Vikas Mali AGP for the State.

CORAM :

NARESH H. PATIL AND V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATED :

1st APIL 2015.

P.C.

1) Heard.

2) Petitioner is aggrieved by the direction issued by the Chief Executive Officer, lodging criminal prosecution against petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent. Inquiry report is drawn without hearing the petitioner.

3) In case, F.I.R. is filed against petitioner, petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy permissible in Law in respect of the registration

2/2 903.3389.15 wp.sxw of F.IR. Disputed questions and facts are involved. Thorough inquiry was conducted which refers to various issues, accounts and notings in the file. 4) Writ petition stands disposed of.

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) ism