Rohini Veepane Macker And ANR v. Veepane Surendranath Macker And ANR
Tikam APPR 188 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 188 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION ST No. 205 OF 2017 Rohini Veepane Macker and Anr.
...Applicants Vs.
Veepane Surendranath Macker and Anr.
...Respondents
Mr. Pooja Jalan for Applicants Mr. Pradip R. Kadam for Respondent No.1 CORAM :
PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE : 19 JANUARY, 2018.
P.C. :- 1.
This is an application for condonation of delay of 107 days in preferring the criminal revision application. The Applicants had challenged the order dated 26th April, 2016 passed by the Family Court at Bandra in petition preferred by the Applicants for maintenance. 2.
Applicant No.1 has stated that she was in poor health and was unable to meet her advocate to give appropriate instructions for filing the revision application.
3.
The Respondents have tendered a reply opposing the application for condonation of delay.
4.
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is required to be condoned. Hence, I pass the following order:
1/2
Tikam APPR 188 of 2017 Order (i) Criminal Application No. 188 of 2017 is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a);
(ii) Criminal Application No.188 of 2017 stands disposed of. [PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] Tikam 2/2