Annaso Tulajonda Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 13.661.16 ba

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 661 OF 2016 Annaso Tulajonda Patil .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. Subir Sarkar Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Nitin B. Patil for intervener/complainant Ms. Veera Shinde APP for the State.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : OCTOBER 4, 2016.

PC :

1) At the threshold, the learned APP upon instructions submits that in the present case, charge is framed. Applicant is admitted in Jail Hospital. 2) Taking into consideration the fact that the charge is framed, the learned Sessions Judge Kolhapur is hereby directed to conclude the recording of substantive evidence as far as possible within 6 months from the date of receipt of this order. Application stands disposed of. 3) In the eventuality that there is no progress in the trial, applicant would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after 6 months. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism