← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1359/2017rule discharged

Ashabai Bhaskar Pagare v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2017-07-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.K. Tahilramani2 pages

* 1/2 * 33-WP-1359-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1359 OF 2017 Sau. Ashabai Bhaskar Pagare ......Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.......Respondents Mr. D.G.Khamkar , Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. H.J.Dedia, APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM :

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE :

DATE :

July 6, 2017.

July 6, 2017.

ORAL ORDER : [Per SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] ORAL ORDER : [Per SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] Heard both sides.

Heard both sides.

Petitioner is undergoing life imprisonment. Petitioner is undergoing life imprisonment. Petitioner has completed almost more than 14 years of Petitioner has completed almost more than 14 years of actual imprisonment. Prayer of the petitioner is that actual imprisonment. Prayer of the petitioner is that direction be given to the State Government to decide the direction be given to the State Government to decide the case of the petitioner for premature release as per the case of the petitioner for premature release as per the guide-lines of the State Government.

guide-lines of the State Government.

Shivgan

* 2/2 * 33-WP-1359-2017.doc The learned APP has handed over The learned APP has handed over communication dated 21.6.2017 which is taken on record communication dated 21.6.2017 which is taken on record and marked 'X' for Identification. It shows that case of the and marked 'X' for Identification. It shows that case of the petitioner for premature release has been decided by the petitioner for premature release has been decided by the State Government and the petitioner will be released from State Government and the petitioner will be released from prison after completing 26 years of imprisonment including prison after completing 26 years of imprisonment including remission. It is stated that the petitioner has been placed in remission. It is stated that the petitioner has been placed in the category 2(C) of 2010 guide-lines for premature the category 2(C) of 2010 guide-lines for premature release.

release.

In this view of the matter, no further directions In this view of the matter, no further directions are necessary.

are necessary.

Rule is discharged.

Rule is discharged.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) (SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J) Shivgan