Bharat N. Vaishnawa v. The State Of Maharashtra

p3_apl_299_2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 299 OF 2015 Bharat N. Vaishnawa ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

------ Ms Rushita Jain i/b Law Global Advocate for Applicant. Smt. P.P. Bhosale for the Respondent -State.

CORAM:-M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.

DATED :6th APRIL, 2015.

P.C.

Not on board. Taken on board on being mentioned on the ground of urgency.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant prays for speaking to the minutes. During the course of hearing it is noted that there is something wrong in the prayer clause itself. As such, only the prayer clause is to be amended. The Court cannot modify the order. 3.

Leave to amend is granted. Matter be placed before the Court immediately after the amendment. Amendment be carried out immediately.

(JUDGE) megha Page No.1 of 1