Pune Municipal Corporation And Another v. Shri Parasnenmal Jain

Tapadia RR/B.74(ii) 1/2 CAS/1205/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1205 OF 2014 IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO. 9597 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders.

Mr. Manoj Badgujar i/b Mr. A. P. Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. Vishal Muglikar i/b Mr. Mayur Dilip Joglekar, Advocate for Respondent no 1.

Mr. Samrat K. Shinde i/b Mr.

T.D.Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent no.2.

CORAM: R.G.KETKAR, J.

DATE : 24/04/2015 PC:

1.

Heard Mr. Manoj Badgujar, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Vishal Muglikar, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. Samrat Shinde, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

2.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 128 days in filing Second Appeal. Office remark shows that respondents no. 3B to 3F, 4A to 4C are served. Respondent no.3A has died leaving behind respondent no.3B as legal

2/2 CAS/1205/2014 representative of respondent no.3A.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application which are not controverted, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Hence, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs. Office is directed to register Appeal, if it is otherwise ready.

(R.G.KETKAR, J.)