Narayan Hiru Warghade Decd Thru Lhr Hiraman N Warghade v. The Dy. Collector, Rehabilitation ,Pune And ORS
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5112 OF 2019 Hiraman Narayan Warghade
...Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Collector, Rehabilitation Pune District, Pune & ors.
...Respondents
Mr. N. P. Deshpande, for the Petitioners.
Mrs. Madhubala Kajale, 'B' Panel Counsel, AGP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM:
R. M. BORDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED:
22nd April, 2019 PC:- 1.
The Writ Petition can be disposed of in terms of directions issued by the Division Bench of this Court in Public Interest Litigation No.171 of 2014 decided on February 13, 2017. The Petitioner's claim to be project affected person, whose land was acquired. It is the contention of the Petitioner that in spite of constant persuasion, no steps have been taken by the Respondents for granting the benefits under the provisions of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999. In similar situation, while dismissing the Public Interest Litigation No.171 of 2014 certain directions are issued. This Petition can be disposed of conveniently by issuing similar directions. Hence, the order: 1/3
O R D E R
(i) We direct the Deputy Collector (Resettlement), Pune to examine the cases of the project affected persons herein with a view to ascertain whether they are project affected persons as claimed by them and whether they are entitled to allotment of lands under the provisions of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999.
(ii) We further direct that the Petitioner to appear before the Deputy Collector (Resettlement), Pune on 13th May, 2019 and produce necessary documents along with their Representation claiming benefits. In the event of request made by the Petitioner for grant of time to enable him to furnish the documents, it would be open for the Deputy Collector to grant further time after considering his Representation with necessary documents.
(iii) The Deputy Collector (Resettlement), Pune shall pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible preferably in the period of six months from the date of appearance of Petitioner before the concerned authority. (iv) In the event, the Deputy Collector (Resettlement) upholds entitlement of Petitioner for allotment of land, it would be necessary for the said authorities to take further 2/3
steps in pursuance of the decision and necessary steps shall be taken as early as possible and preferably within six months from the date of such decision.
(v) It is needless to mention that the Respondentauthority shall have to follow the procedure under Section 16(2) of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 i.e. the issuance of notice to the Petitioner calling upon them to express their willingness in respect of allotment of land and on receipt of communication to the notice by the concerned authority, to take further steps.
(vi) It would also be obligatory on the part of the Petitioner to deposit the amount within the time stipulated in the Act. In the event of any difficulty in respect of allotment of land, it would be obligatory on the part of the authorities to observe the procedure prescribed by law and to pass appropriate orders within the contemplation of sub-section 4 of Section 16 of the Act.
2.
In view of the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [R. M. BORDE, J.] 3/3