Kharpattu Dasa Maurya v. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority

26 caa 496-14=.doc FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 496 OF 2014 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST.) NO. 9679 OF 2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders None for the applicant.

Mr. Kuldeep Patil for the respondent.

CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATED : 27/01/2015.

P.C.:

.

None for the applicant. Mr. Patil learned Counsel for the respondent.

Office note shows that on earlier occasion also on one appeared on behalf of applicant. Hence, dismissed for default.

In view of dismissal of Civil Application, nothing survives in the Appeal from Order. Hence, registration of Appeal from Order stands rejected. (K.K.TATED, J.) Sneha Chavan 1/1