Dr. S.J. Dahiwale v. Halde Dinesh Daulat

27.caw.2490.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2488 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO.315 OF 2015 Dr. S. J. Dahiwale ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Deshpande Pradip Vishnu ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2489 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 59 OF 2015 Dr. S. J. Dahiwale ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Nerpagar Dinkar Jankiram ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2490 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 16 OF 2015 Dr. S. J. Dahiwale ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Aswale 1/2

27.caw.2490.17.doc Halde Dinesh Daulat ..Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents Mr. N. M. Gangule, for the Petitioner in all petitions. Mr. B. V. Deshmukh, for the Applicant in all civil applications. Mr. Rajendra Anbhule, for the Respondent No.3. Mr. Vikas Mali, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. CORAM:-B.R.GAVAI & B. P. COLABAWALLA,JJ.

DATE :- FEBRUARY 7, 2018.

P. C.:

These are the applications for intervention.

In service jurisprudence if the lis is between the employer and employee, a third party cannot be permitted to intervene in the said proceedings. All the Civil Applications are, therefore, rejected.

( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. ) ( B. R. GAVAI, J. ) Aswale 2/2