Mrs. Kirtida Ketan Shah v. Mr. Ketan Suresh Shah

cam93 ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.93 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.61 OF 2009 Kirtida Ketan Shah ...Applicant vs.

Ketan Suresh Shah

...Respondent

Ms Radhika Mehta for the applicant Mr.H.T.Pawar for the respondent CORAM : A.S.OKA, & P.D.NAIK, JJ.

DATE : MAY 5, 2016 P.C.:

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned counsel for the respondent-husband. The learned counsel for the respondent-husband on instructions of the respondent-husband who is personally present in the Court states that he has no objection if the prayer clause (a) is granted. He states that even today, entry of the applicant will be permitted to the premises mentioned in the prayer clause (a).

We accept the aforesaid statements made by the learned counsel for the respondent-husband. Needless to record that it will be the responsibility of the parties to ensure that no untoward incident is created after the applicant is allowed entry in the premises.

cam93 Accordingly, we dispose the application by passing the following application :

(I) The statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent-husband on instructions of the respondent-husband is accepted;

(II) The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(P.D.NAIK,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)