Rajkumar @ Pappu Ramfer Harijan v. The State Of Maharashtra

(16)APPANo.5052018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.505 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.309 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.204 OF 2016 Rajkumar @ Pappu Ramfer Harijan ...

Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent .....

Mr.Atul P. Kakade with Mr.Anand Palande, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr.Prashant Jadhav, APP for the Respondent/State. ....

CORAM : A.M.BADAR J.

DATED : 5th APRIL 2018.

P.C. :

Heard the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant/accused, who submitted that he is restricting the application to the prayer clause 13(i) and is not insisting for deletion of words 'local sureties'.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

Gaikwad RD 1/2

(16)APPANo.5052018 Considering the fact that the applicant is in search of surety, the application is granted in terms of prayer clause 13(i). (A.M.BADAR J.) Gaikwad RD 2/2