Kairav Shaliesh Parikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 12 wp 3648.2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3648 OF 2021 Mr. Kairav Shailesh Parikh ....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

....Respondents Ms. Gayatri Nitin Gokhale, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the respondent-State. Ms. Zainba Abdi i/b. Ms. Shweta B. Kamble, advocate for respondent No.2.

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 7th MARCH, 2022.

P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, orally prayed leave to amend the petition, as in the cause-title of the petition, the name of the respondent No.2 was inadvertently mentioned as "Mrs. Gurpreet Kaur" instead of "Mrs.Charanjeet Kaur Gill". Leave as prayed for, is granted. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. 2.

For the reasons recorded separately, the petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and is disposed of as such. ( S. M. MODAK, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2022.03.08 11:27:32 +0530 1/1 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM